Building Legal Datasets
Clicks: 29
ID: 283286
2021
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Steady Performance
8.4
/100
29 views
16 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
SteadyRanked #717 of 803 articles by views in arXiv
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 803 in total.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Data-centric AI calls for better, not just bigger, datasets. As data
protection laws with extra-territorial reach proliferate worldwide, ensuring
datasets are legal is an increasingly crucial yet overlooked component of
``better''. To help dataset builders become more willing and able to navigate
this complex legal space, this paper reviews key legal obligations surrounding
ML datasets, examines the practical impact of data laws on ML pipelines, and
offers a framework for building legal datasets.
| Reference Key |
soh2021building
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Jerrold Soh |
| Journal | arXiv |
| Year | 2021 |
| DOI |
DOI not found
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.