The Probability of Causation
Clicks: 68
ID: 283285
2017
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Popular Article
20.1
/100
68 views
15 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
PopularRanked #420 of 803 articles by views in arXiv
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 803 in total.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Many legal cases require decisions about causality, responsibility or blame,
and these may be based on statistical data. However, causal inferences from
such data are beset by subtle conceptual and practical difficulties, and in
general it is, at best, possible to identify the "probability of causation" as
lying between certain empirically informed limits. These limits can be refined
and improved if we can obtain additional information, from statistical or
scientific data, relating to the internal workings of the causal processes. In
this paper we review and extend recent work in this area, where additional
information may be available on covariate and/or mediating variables.
| Reference Key |
murtas2017the
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Philip Dawid; Monica Musio; Rossella Murtas |
| Journal | arXiv |
| Year | 2017 |
| DOI |
DOI not found
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.