Nature conservation policies are biased toward forests and neglect grassy ecosystems worldwide.
Clicks: 20
ID: 282884
2025
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Improving Quality
0.0
/100
Combines engagement data with AI-assessed academic quality
Reader Engagement
Emerging Content
3.6
/100
12 views
7 readers
Trending
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Abstract
Globally, grassy ecosystems (including grasslands, savannas, shrublands, woodlands, and tundra) cover 30 to 40% of the land and provide important benefits such as climate change mitigation and adaptation, livestock production, and cultural services. However, despite their importance, the conservation of grassy ecosystems-compared with that of forests-has been neglected around the world, leading to a greater loss rate than forest ecosystems in many regions. Here, we examine this bias in public conservation discourse and policies that give priority to forests and neglect the conservation of grassy ecosystems worldwide. We argue that grassy ecosystems need stronger legal safeguards and global recognition to match forest conservation efforts.
| Reference Key |
pillar2025nature
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Pillar, Valério D; Overbeck, Gerhard E |
| Journal | Science |
| Year | 2025 |
| DOI |
10.1126/science.adx7441
|
| URL | |
| Keywords | Keywords not found |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.