Leveraging a Joint of Phenotypic and Genetic Features on Cancer Patient Subgrouping
Clicks: 30
ID: 282839
2021
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Steady Performance
8.7
/100
30 views
18 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
SteadyRanked #718 of 803 articles by views in arXiv
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 803 in total.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Cancer is responsible for millions of deaths worldwide every year. Although
significant progress has been achieved in cancer medicine, many issues remain
to be addressed for improving cancer therapy. Appropriate cancer patient
stratification is the prerequisite for selecting appropriate treatment plan, as
cancer patients are of known heterogeneous genetic make-ups and phenotypic
differences. In this study, built upon deep phenotypic characterizations
extractable from Mayo Clinic electronic health records (EHRs) and genetic test
reports for a collection of cancer patients, we developed a system leveraging a
joint of phenotypic and genetic features for cancer patient subgrouping.
The workflow is roughly divided into three parts: feature preprocessing,
cancer patient classification, and cancer patient clustering based. In feature
preprocessing step, we performed filtering, retaining the most relevant
features. In cancer patient classification, we utilized joint categorical
features to build a patient-feature matrix and applied nine different machine
learning models, Random Forests (RF), Decision Tree (DT), Support Vector
Machine (SVM), Naive Bayes (NB), Logistic Regression (LR), Multilayer
Perceptron (MLP), Gradient Boosting (GB), Convolutional Neural Network (CNN),
and Feedforward Neural Network (FNN), for classification purposes. Finally, in
the cancer patient clustering step, we leveraged joint embeddings features and
patient-feature associations to build an undirected feature graph and then
trained the cancer feature node embeddings.
| Reference Key |
shen2021leveraging
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | David Oniani; Chen Wang; Yiqing Zhao; Andrew Wen; Hongfang Liu; Feichen Shen |
| Journal | arXiv |
| Year | 2021 |
| DOI |
DOI not found
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.