A universal framework for inclusive 15-minute cities
Clicks: 25
ID: 282788
2024
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Emerging Content
7.2
/100
25 views
12 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
EmergingRanked #766 of 803 articles by views in arXiv
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 803 in total.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Proximity-based cities have attracted much attention in recent years. The
15-minute city, in particular, heralded a new vision for cities where essential
services must be easily accessible. Despite its undoubted merit in stimulating
discussion on new organisations of cities, the 15-minute city cannot be
applicable everywhere, and its very definition raises a few concerns. Here, we
tackle the feasibility and practicability of the '15-minute city' model in many
cities worldwide. We provide a worldwide quantification of how close cities are
to the ideal of the 15-minute city. To this end, we measure the accessibility
times to resources and services, and we reveal strong heterogeneity of
accessibility within and across cities, with a significant role played by local
population densities. We provide an online platform
(\href{whatif.sonycsl.it/15mincity}{whatif.sonycsl.it/15mincity}) to access and
visualise accessibility scores for virtually all cities worldwide. The
heterogeneity of accessibility within cities is one of the sources of
inequality. We thus simulate how much a better redistribution of resources and
services could heal inequity by keeping the same resources and services or by
allowing for virtually infinite resources. We highlight pronounced
discrepancies among cities in the minimum number of additional services needed
to comply with the 15-minute city concept. We conclude that the proximity-based
paradigm must be generalised to work on a wide range of local population
densities. Finally, socio-economic and cultural factors should be included to
shift from time-based to value-based cities.
| Reference Key |
loreto2024a
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Matteo Bruno; Hygor Piaget Monteiro Melo; Bruno Campanelli; Vittorio Loreto |
| Journal | arXiv |
| Year | 2024 |
| DOI |
DOI not found
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.