Unveiling The Factors of Aesthetic Preferences with Explainable AI
Clicks: 37
ID: 282481
2023
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Steady Performance
10.8
/100
37 views
19 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
SteadyRanked #656 of 803 articles by views in arXiv
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 803 in total.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
The allure of aesthetic appeal in images captivates our senses, yet the
underlying intricacies of aesthetic preferences remain elusive. In this study,
we pioneer a novel perspective by utilizing several different machine learning
(ML) models that focus on aesthetic attributes known to influence preferences.
Our models process these attributes as inputs to predict the aesthetic scores
of images. Moreover, to delve deeper and obtain interpretable explanations
regarding the factors driving aesthetic preferences, we utilize the popular
Explainable AI (XAI) technique known as SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP).
Our methodology compares the performance of various ML models, including Random
Forest, XGBoost, Support Vector Regression, and Multilayer Perceptron, in
accurately predicting aesthetic scores, and consistently observing results in
conjunction with SHAP. We conduct experiments on three image aesthetic
benchmarks, namely Aesthetics with Attributes Database (AADB), Explainable
Visual Aesthetics (EVA), and Personalized image Aesthetics database with Rich
Attributes (PARA), providing insights into the roles of attributes and their
interactions. Finally, our study presents ML models for aesthetics research,
alongside the introduction of XAI. Our aim is to shed light on the complex
nature of aesthetic preferences in images through ML and to provide a deeper
understanding of the attributes that influence aesthetic judgements.
| Reference Key |
wagemans2023unveiling
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Derya Soydaner; Johan Wagemans |
| Journal | arXiv |
| Year | 2023 |
| DOI |
DOI not found
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.