Conceptual Modeling of Actions
Clicks: 67
ID: 282426
2022
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Steady Performance
19.8
/100
67 views
27 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
SteadyRanked #471 of 803 articles by views in arXiv
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 803 in total.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Modeling in software engineering includes constructing static, dynamic, and
behavioral representations. In describing system behavior, actions and states
are two of the most commonly used concepts. In this paper, we focus on the
notion of action. It generally held that the meaning of the concept of action
is not that easy to grasp. According to some researchers, many existing systems
do involve the notion of action, but in an obscure way. In Unified Modeling
Language (UML), an action is a single atomic step within an activity, i.e., it
is not further decomposed within the activity. Activity represents a behavior
that is composed of actions. This paper contributes to the establishment of a
broader interdisciplinary understanding of the notion of action in conceptual
modeling based on a model called the thinging machine (TM). The TM uses only
five primitive actions: create, process, release, transfer, and receive. The
goal of such a venture is to improve the process of developing conceptual
models by refining basic concepts such as action and event. To demonstrate how
TM modeling represents actions, UML activity and Business Process Model and
Notation (BPMN) diagrams are re-modeled in terms of the five TM actions. The
results reveal the viability of the TM s five actions in modeling and relate
them to other important notions such as activity, event, and behavior.
| Reference Key |
al-fedaghi2022conceptual
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Sabah Al-Fedaghi |
| Journal | arXiv |
| Year | 2022 |
| DOI |
DOI not found
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.