"Everybody's problem but nobody's problem": Qualitative study on integrating smoking cessation and mental health services in Singapore.

Clicks: 71
ID: 282412
2025
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Emerging

Ranked #2,006 of 2,056 articles by views in PloS one

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 2,056 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
Although quitting smoking benefits mental health, people with mental health conditions tend to have higher smoking rates and more severe tobacco use disorders. Integration of smoking cessation into mental healthcare, or vice versa, could help to meet the needs of this population. While Singapore offers specialist smoking cessation and mental health services, it is unclear how these services address the needs of people with comorbid tobacco use and mental health issues. This study aimed to explore the integration of smoking cessation and mental health services in Singapore from the perspective of healthcare professionals. We conducted one-on-one semi-structured interviews with 21 Singaporean health professionals with expertise in mental health (n = 5), smoking cessation (n = 5), primary healthcare (n = 3), specialist respiratory or emergency care (n = 3) or health systems and policy (n = 5). We recruited participants from the authors' professional networks and subsequently via snowballing. We used inductive coding methods to identify themes that emerged from the data. Health professionals were divided on whether smoking and mental health are sufficiently interconnected to justify more integrated or tailored services. Smoking cessation and mental health were generally approached in a siloed manner, reflecting systemic barriers to integration as well as ranging levels of awareness among health professionals on the association between smoking and mental health. While some participants welcomed the integration of smoking cessation and mental health services as a more convenient, effective and equitable way to address the needs of this population, others deemed it unnecessary and viewed smoking as a lifestyle habit, distinct from other mental health issues. There is a need to educate health professionals on smoking as a mental health issue and to consider more tailored programmes designed to address smoking cessation and mental health needs simultaneously.
Reference Key
lok2025everybodys Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Lok, Yee Ling; Tan, Grace Ping Ping; Subramaniam, Mythily; van der Eijk, Yvette
Journal PloS one
Year 2025
DOI
10.1371/journal.pone.0322786
URL
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.