Geodiversity of Research: A Comparison of Geographical Topic Focus and Author Location using SDG 2: Zero Hunger as a Case Study
Clicks: 76
ID: 282369
2023
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Steady Performance
22.5
/100
76 views
26 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
SteadyRanked #314 of 803 articles by views in arXiv
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 803 in total.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
This study examined the geodiversity of research through comparing topic
focus with author location using SDG 2: Zero hunger as a case study. As the
research was related to hunger, papers were mapped on to the Global Hunger
Index country categories as convenient classification. The publication dataset
comprised 60,000 papers from the Dimensions database that have been associated
with hunger research using Digital Science machine learning algorithm that
enhances expert led search strategies. Only 41% hunger-related publications
that focus on countries most affected by hunger feature authors affiliated to
institutions in those countries. Even fewer of those publications feature
locally based authors in first or last position. These numbers gradually
reverse as the level of hunger declines. We analyse sample papers in an attempt
to understand the reasons for these trends. These included differences in
research infrastructure, sub-authorship recognition such as acknowledgements,
and limitations of the relationship between country mention and real topical
focus. We did not find evidence of widespread differences between senior and
overall authorship and consequently urge caution before judging international
collaborations as helicopter research based only on author country affiliations
and authorship position.
| Reference Key |
purnell2023geodiversity
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Philip James Purnell |
| Journal | arXiv |
| Year | 2023 |
| DOI |
DOI not found
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.