[Mirror, mirror on the wall: Students' self-assessment of therapeutic skills is prone to systematic biases].
Clicks: 77
ID: 282202
2025
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Emerging Content
22.8
/100
77 views
35 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
EmergingRanked #5 of 5 articles by views in Psychotherapie, Psychosomatik, medizinische Psychologie
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Self-reflection is considered a central component in the training of clinical psychologists and requires accurate self-assessment of psychotherapeutic competencies. However, previous research suggests that self-assessment of psychotherapeutic skills is prone to biases. The aim of this study was to assess the ability of master's students to evaluate their own competencies and to identify person-specific and situational factors predicting self-assessment.The study was conducted as part of the communication skills practicum in the master's program in Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy at the University of Mannheim. At the end of the practicum, students conducted an anamnesis interview with simulated patients. Subsequently, 39 master's students assessed their own psychotherapeutic competencies in the anamnesis interview using the Cognitive Therapy Scale. Additionally, a trained expert evaluated the competencies to compare self-assessments with external evaluations. Therapeutic self-efficacy was recorded before the practicum as a person-specific factor predicting self-assessment. The difficulty of the simulated interview was coded to determine situational factors.On average, the agreement between self-assessment and external evaluation of competencies was low (ICC=0.25). Overall, students underestimated their psychotherapeutic competencies, particularly when their performance was above average. However, when their performance was below average, they tended to overestimate their competencies. Especially higher therapeutic self-efficacy predicted more positive self-assessment scores. Higher self-efficacy was also associated with an overestimation of one's own competencies.The results of the study indicate that self-assessment of psychotherapeutic competencies by master's students is subject to systematic biases. Initial findings also suggest that person-specific factors are better predictors of the distortion of self-assessment than situational factors.To ensure beneficial self-reflection, master's students should be trained in the reliable assessment of their own psychotherapeutic competencies.
| Reference Key |
fraunfelter2025mirror
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Fraunfelter, Laura-Ashley; Gerdes, Antje B M; Alpers, Georg W |
| Journal | Psychotherapie, Psychosomatik, medizinische Psychologie |
| Year | 2025 |
| DOI |
10.1055/a-2547-8479
|
| URL | |
| Keywords | Keywords not found |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.