Evaluation of meningitis surveillance system in rural area, Rwanda.

Clicks: 36
ID: 282144
2025
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Emerging

Ranked #1,600 of 1,628 articles by views in Scientific reports

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 1,628 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
Bacterial meningitis is a significant public health concern, with over 1.2 million cases reported globally each year. Rwanda is at increased risk of meningitis outbreaks due to its proximity to countries that lie in the meningitis belt. Rwanda has been conducting surveillance and recording meningitis outbreak cases across the country since 2012. We evaluated the meningitis surveillance system at Kibogora Level Two Teaching hospital, Nyamasheke district of Rwanda to assess whether the surveillance objectives were being met. The study was cross-sectional, using purposive sampling to select healthcare providers participating in the meningitis surveillance. Rwanda's bacterial meningitis data from 2017 to 2021 was collected from clinical registers and Rwanda's electronic integrated disease surveillance system (eIDSR) from Kibogora Level Two Teaching Hospital catchment area, Nyamasheke district, Rwanda. The study area was chosen because a meningitis outbreak was recorded in the area and its bordering country namely Democratic of Republic of Congo (DRC) prior to the current study period. Information on the participant's demographics, occupation, training, professional experience, and their perception on the surveillance system were gathered using a structured questionnaire. Meningitis surveillance systems attributes including usefulness, acceptability, and flexibility were assessed and categorized as poor (< 50% score), reasonable (50-69%), good (70-90%), or excellent (> 90%) in reference to the study conducted on the evaluation of the meningitis surveillance system in Luanda Province, Angola in March 2017. Data collected from clinical registers and eIDSR were used to assess core functions of the meningitis surveillance system including accuracy in detection of cases, laboratory confirmation of cases, and availability of evaluation reports. Descriptive statistics were analyzed using Microsoft Office Excel. Thirty-one healthcare providers working on meningitis surveillance in the Kibogora Level Two Teaching Hospital were interviewed. During the period under evaluation, 48 suspected cases of meningitis were identified; 43 (90%) met the surveillance case definition, and only 10 (21%) were reported to eIDSR (completeness). Attributes such as flexibility scored good while stability and acceptability scored reasonable. Out of 48 suspected meningitis cases, only 2 (4%) samples were collected from patients and sent to the hospital laboratory for analysis. This study found a good knowledge level of the meningitis surveillance system among healthcare workers; however, the system's core functions, such as notification rate and laboratory confirmation were found to have gaps. The notification rate could be improved by conducting regular refresher courses for healthcare workers supporting surveillance system. Moreover, MoH could enhance the implementation of a national policy requiring mandatory CSF sample testing to confirm pathogens for all suspected cases. Future studies should explore performance-based incentives to improve reporting completeness. Rwanda's experience could provide insights for other low-resource settings facing similar surveillance challenges.
Reference Key
nyinawabeza2025evaluation Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Nyinawabeza, Solange; Niyoyita, Jean Claude; Nshimiyimana, Emmanuel; Ndayisenga, Jerome; Umutoni, Angela; Stamatakis, Caroline
Journal Scientific reports
Year 2025
DOI
10.1038/s41598-025-99538-z
URL
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.