Experiences of discrimination across the life course among pregnancy planners in the United States and Canada.
Clicks: 115
ID: 282140
2025
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Emerging Content
30.0
/100
115 views
29 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
EmergingRanked #22 of 24 articles by views in SSM - population health
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Little is known about discrimination among pregnancy planners. We used questionnaire data from Pregnancy Study Online (PRESTO), a preconception cohort study, to characterize experiences, attributions, and responses to discrimination (n = 10,460). Eligible participants were assigned female at birth, aged 21-45 years, U.S. or Canadian residents, and not using contraception or fertility treatment. Participants completed a supplemental questionnaire (2013-2024) that included the Philadelphia Urban ACE Survey, Williams' Everyday Discrimination and Major Experiences of Discrimination scales, and Krieger's instrument on responses to discrimination. Mean age at enrollment was 30.9 years. Overall, 83.8 % of participants identified as non-Hispanic White, and 50.4 % had ≥17 years education. Discrimination across the life course varied: 11 % of participants reported childhood racial discrimination, 80.3 % reported ever experiencing everyday discrimination, and 47.2 % reported ever experiencing lifetime discrimination. The most prevalent types of everyday discrimination included being perceived as not smart (63.4 %) and being treated with disrespect (62.6 %), while job-related discrimination was the most frequently-reported lifetime experience (33.9 %). Most Black participants (non-Hispanic and Hispanic) reported their race or ethnicity as one of the main reasons they were discriminated against (87.7 % and 80 %, respectively), while sex or gender was most commonly-reported by other racial and ethnic groups (range: 75.9-82.4 %). Most participants responded passively to discrimination: keeping it to themselves and accepting it as a fact of life (37.4 %). All participants other than non-Hispanic White reported greater exposure to discrimination across the life course, and attributions for discrimination ( race, gender, education, income level) varied across racial and ethnic groups.
| Reference Key |
lovett2025experiences
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Lovett, Sharonda M; Wise, Lauren A; Abrams, Jasmine; Wesselink, Amelia K; Sabbath, Erika L; Geller, Ruth J; Coleman, Chad M; Kuriyama, Andrea S; Hoffman, Molly N; Ukah, U Vivian; Boynton-Jarrett, Renée; Ncube, Collette N |
| Journal | SSM - population health |
| Year | 2025 |
| DOI |
10.1016/j.ssmph.2025.101803
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.