Cotton Yield Prediction Using Random Forest
Clicks: 87
ID: 282033
2023
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Steady Performance
25.8
/100
87 views
15 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
SteadyRanked #297 of 803 articles by views in arXiv
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 803 in total.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
The cotton industry in the United States is committed to sustainable
production practices that minimize water, land, and energy use while improving
soil health and cotton output. Climate-smart agricultural technologies are
being developed to boost yields while decreasing operating expenses. Crop yield
prediction, on the other hand, is difficult because of the complex and
nonlinear impacts of cultivar, soil type, management, pest and disease,
climate, and weather patterns on crops. To solve this issue, we employ machine
learning (ML) to forecast production while considering climate change, soil
diversity, cultivar, and inorganic nitrogen levels. From the 1980s to the
1990s, field data were gathered across the southern cotton belt of the United
States. To capture the most current effects of climate change over the previous
six years, a second data source was produced using the process-based crop
model, GOSSYM. We concentrated our efforts on three distinct areas inside each
of the three southern states: Texas, Mississippi, and Georgia. To simplify the
amount of computations, accumulated heat units (AHU) for each set of
experimental data were employed as an analogy to use time-series weather data.
The Random Forest Regressor yielded a 97.75% accuracy rate, with a root mean
square error of 55.05 kg/ha and an R2 of around 0.98. These findings
demonstrate how an ML technique may be developed and applied as a reliable and
easy-to-use model to support the cotton climate-smart initiative.
| Reference Key |
malakar2023cotton
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Alakananda Mitra; Sahila Beegum; David Fleisher; Vangimalla R. Reddy; Wenguang Sun; Chittaranjan Ray; Dennis Timlin; Arindam Malakar |
| Journal | arXiv |
| Year | 2023 |
| DOI |
DOI not found
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.