Evaluating the Accuracy of Android Applications in Monitoring Environmental Noise Levels.
Clicks: 29
ID: 281986
2025
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Improving Quality
0.0
/100
Combines engagement data with AI-assessed academic quality
Reader Engagement
Emerging Content
4.8
/100
16 views
16 readers
Trending
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Abstract
Objective This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of Android applications (apps) in measuring environmental noise levels, focusing on their potential use for occupational health assessments. Methods The top 10, highly rated, free Android apps were tested on a Samsung Galaxy A54 Smartphone (Samsung Group, Samsung Town, Seoul, South Korea) using pure tones at 100 Hz, 2000 Hz, and 4000 Hz, across four noise levels (25 dB, 40 dB, and 85 dB). Measurements were compared with a calibrated Precision Gold N09AQ environment meter (Maplin Electronics Ltd, Wath-Upon-Dearne, United Kingdom) in a controlled room. Data were analyzed using linear regression to determine R values for each app. Results The control meter showed the highest accuracy (R = 0.99). SPL Meter dB and sound Meter (KTW apps, Petaling Jaya, Selangor, Malaysia) and Sound Meter (Pony AI Inc.,Guangzhou, Guangdong, China) had the best performance (R = 0.98). Accuracy declined at higher noise levels, with Sound Meter (ABC Apps) showing the least accuracy (R = 0.85). User ratings did not correlate consistently with app performance. Conclusion Android apps offer potential as affordable noise measurement tools, with some apps demonstrating high accuracy at lower decibels. However, limitations such as reduced accuracy at higher decibels and lack of A-weighting for regulatory compliance hinder their use in professional settings. Further development and real-world testing are needed.
| Reference Key |
khan2025evaluating
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Khan, Hamad; Findlay, Callum; Stevenson, Ruth-Ann; Singh, T |
| Journal | Cureus |
| Year | 2025 |
| DOI |
10.7759/cureus.81471
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.