Betting and Belief: Prediction Markets and Attribution of Climate Change
Clicks: 126
ID: 281675
2016
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Popular Article
30.0
/100
126 views
45 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
PopularRanked #26 of 803 articles by views in arXiv
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 803 in total.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Despite much scientific evidence, a large fraction of the American public
doubts that greenhouse gases are causing global warming. We present a
simulation model as a computational test-bed for climate prediction markets.
Traders adapt their beliefs about future temperatures based on the profits of
other traders in their social network. We simulate two alternative climate
futures, in which global temperatures are primarily driven either by carbon
dioxide or by solar irradiance. These represent, respectively, the scientific
consensus and a hypothesis advanced by prominent skeptics. We conduct
sensitivity analyses to determine how a variety of factors describing both the
market and the physical climate may affect traders' beliefs about the cause of
global climate change. Market participation causes most traders to converge
quickly toward believing the "true" climate model, suggesting that a climate
market could be useful for building public consensus.
| Reference Key |
gilligan2016betting
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | John J. Nay; Martin Van der Linden; Jonathan M. Gilligan |
| Journal | arXiv |
| Year | 2016 |
| DOI |
DOI not found
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.