A phase II study of monalizumab and durvalumab in patients with recurrent/metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: results of the I2 cohort of the EORTC-HNCG-1559 trial (UPSTREAM).
Clicks: 95
ID: 281600
2025
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Improving Quality
0.0
/100
Combines engagement data with AI-assessed academic quality
Reader Engagement
Emerging Content
13.8
/100
46 views
20 readers
Trending
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Abstract
Monalizumab (M), targeting the natural killer group 2A (NKG2A) receptor, has limited activity as monotherapy in recurrent/metastatic (R/M) squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN). Preliminary data of M and durvalumab (D) have shown encouraging activity in other tumor types. The UPSTREAM trial was an umbrella trial of targeted therapies and immunotherapy for R/M SCCHN. The immunotherapy 2 (I2) cohort was a phase II, randomized, open-label substudy evaluating the efficacy of D + M versus physician's choice (control). Patients non-eligible for the biomarker-driven cohorts and pretreated with PD(L)1, were included in the I2 cohort. The primary endpoint was the objective response rate (RECIST version 1.1) during the first 16 weeks. Sixty-six patients with R/M SCCHN were included in the I2 cohort, of whom 60 were assessable (D + M: n = 42, control: n = 18): median age 62 years; 87% with two or three previous lines of treatment. In the D + M arm, one partial response (PR) was recorded, and stable disease (SD) was observed in 11 (26%). One PR was reported in the control arm and SD in 8 (44%). The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 2.0 and 3.1 months in the D + M arm and control arm, respectively. The median overall survival (OS) was 4.3 months (95% confidence interval 3.3-8.9 months) and 8.0 months (95% confidence interval 3.1-14.9 months) in the D + M and control arms, respectively. In the D + M arm, 4 (9%) patients reported grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events. The I2 substudy failed to demonstrate an activity of D + M in heavily pretreated patients with SCCHN previously exposed to anti-PD(L)1. No benefit was seen in PFS and OS.
| Reference Key |
galot2025a
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Galot, R; Le Tourneau, C; Licitra, L; Guigay, J; Kong, A; Tinhofer, I; Even, C; Daste, A; Henry, S; Borel, C; Abdeddaim, C; Seront, E; Prevost, J B; Rutten, A; Saada-Bouzid, E; Rolland, F; Bonomo, P; Rasschaert, M; Dirix, L; Olungu, C; Tsechilidou, K; Govaerts, A S; Fortpied, C; Joaquim, A; Machiels, J P |
| Journal | esmo open |
| Year | 2025 |
| DOI |
10.1016/j.esmoop.2025.104554
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.