A systematic review on suction-based airway clearance devices for foreign body airway obstruction.
Clicks: 167
ID: 281222
2025
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Emerging Content
30.0
/100
167 views
60 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
EmergingRanked #7 of 7 articles by views in International emergency nursing
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
The objective of this systematic review is to comprehensively evaluate the effectiveness and safety of negative pressure, anti-choking devices (ACDs) in managing severe foreign body airway obstructions (FBAO) compared to traditional techniques such as the Heimlich maneuver.A comprehensive literature search was conducted in major databases to identify studies published within the past five years. Eligible studies were appraised for quality using the Critical Appraisal and Data Extraction Tool. Data on study design, outcomes, and safety parameters were extracted and analyzed.The review identified studies evaluating various ACDs, including LifeVac and DeChoker, in different settings and populations. Results from retrospective studies and trials on mannequins or cadavers suggested promising outcomes for ACDs in relieving FBAO, with success rates ranging from 71% to 99%. However, concerns regarding usability, training, and adverse events were raised, emphasizing the need for further research.Review emphasizes traditional maneuvers (thrusts/blows) for all rescuers. ACDs show promise, but further research is needed to determine their role alongside established methods. LifeVac's design may offer advantages in terms of ease of use, potentially requiring less dexterity compared to Dechoker. Regardless of the device, proper training remains crucial for optimal effectiveness and safe use. Combining ACDs with traditional methods like abdominal thrusts and back blows may be a promising approach for improving airway obstruction management.
| Reference Key |
paludi2025ainternational
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Paludi, Miguel Angel;Palermo, Natalino;Limonti, Francesco;Semeraro, Angelica;Ermanno, Daniele;Ganzino, Sandro;Ramacciati, Nicola; |
| Journal | International emergency nursing |
| Year | 2025 |
| DOI |
10.1016/j.ienj.2025.101575
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.