Discovering the barriers to scaling a co-design approach for the provision of custom assistive technology within healthcare services.
Clicks: 114
ID: 280957
2024
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Star Article
30.0
/100
114 views
32 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Using computer-aided design and 3D printing within a co-design process to produce assistive technology (AT) has a positive impact in delivering customised solutions to end-users' needs. However, to date its adoption within healthcare services has been limited. This work aims to gather clinicians' insights to identify and analyse barriers inherent in the AT design, manufacturing, and provision processes and inform a detailed understanding of the current AT eco-system. It forms part of a long-term ambition to efficiently scale up a service for the co-design of custom AT across specialties and healthcare services. Five interactive workshops were run with 21 healthcare professionals currently involved in AT provision. Participants were recruited from two health boards in the UK. Thematic analysis was used to identify common barriers to scaling up a custom AT approach. Additionally, an eco-system map was created to determine the key stakeholders and their interactions. Nineteen descriptive themes, grouped into four analytical themes, were identified related to the design of AT, access to AT, healthcare staffing and healthcare system pressures. The eco-system map identified sixteen individual stakeholders and ten different groups of significant corporate stakeholders. The identified barriers relate to both the provision of off-the-shelf and the co-design of customised AT. Further promoting the scaling up of a co-design custom AT process requires: improving communication between stakeholders, enabling information about AT to be easily accessible, ensuring feedback is gathered and used, and creating tools that enable non-expert designers to modify custom AT designs safely and effectively.
| Reference Key |
howard2024discoveringdisability
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Howard, Jonathan;Cloke, Sally;Eggbeer, Dominic;Beverley, Katie; |
| Journal | Disability and rehabilitation. Assistive technology |
| Year | 2024 |
| DOI |
10.1080/17483107.2024.2406443
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.