'Clash of Titans' 2.0. From Conflicting EU General Principles to Conflicting Jurisdictional Authorities: The Court of Justice and the Danish Supreme Court in the Dansk Industri Case

Clicks: 128
ID: 280474
2017
Free PDF
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
(Series Information) European Papers - A Journal on Law and Integration, 2017 2(1), 223-229 | European Forum Insight of 26 March 2017 | (Table of Contents) I. Introduction. - II. The Danish Supreme Court's reasoning. - III. The 'selective' supremacy of EU law according to the Danish Supreme Court: is it time to reaffirm Costa v. ENEL?. - IV. The horizontality of the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights. - V. Conclusion. | (Abstract) The present Insight focuses on the reception by the Danish Supreme Court (judgment of 6 December 2016, no. 15/2014, DI acting for Ajos A/S v. The estate left by A.) of the Court of Justice decision in the Dansk Industri case (judgment of 19 April 2016, case C-441/14 [GC]). Instead of disapplying a national provision which was found by the Court of Justice to be inconsistent with the general principle of non-discrimination of grounds of age, the Danish Supreme Court stresses that the Law of Accession of the Kingdom of Denmark to the European Union does not cover general principles of EU law and the national provision cannot be disapplied. The selective approach of the Danish Supreme Court raises a number of concerns which this Insight highlights: first, a clear misunderstanding regarding the functioning of general principles of EU law; second, a violation of the duty of sincere cooperation and the relate doctrine of supremacy of EU law; third, an arguable assessment of the effects of the Charter of Fundamental Rights.
Reference Key
gualco2017clasheuropean Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Gualco, Elena;
Journal European Papers
Year 2017
DOI
DOI not found
URL
https://www.europeanpapers.eu/en/europeanforum/clash-of-titans-2-0-from-conflicting-eu-general-principles-to-conflicting-jurisdictional-authorities
Keywords
Zoology Archaeology Agriculture (General) law animal culture geology geophysics. cosmic physics fine arts cattle auxiliary sciences of history law of europe

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.