Short-term reactivation of retinopathy of prematurity following primary ranibizumab treatment.

Clicks: 111
ID: 279578
2024
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Steady

Ranked #2 of 2 articles by views in Retina (Philadelphia, Pa.)

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Investigate risk factors for short term reactivation of retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) after intravitreal ranibizumab (IVR) therapy and determine safety and efficacy of repeat injections.Retrospective chart review study of patients screened for ROP as inpatients between 2013-2023 who received IVR within the UCLA healthcare system. Primary outcomes were rates and timing of short term ROP reactivation, defined as repeat worsening of ROP to stage 2 or 3 before 52 weeks postmenstrual age (PMA), as well as risk factors for reactivation. Other outcomes included adverse events and rates of reactivation after a second intravitreal injection.82 eyes of 43 patients received primary IVR 0.25mg/0.025cc for type 1 ROP. 13 patients (22 eyes) (30.2% of patients, 26.8% of eyes) developed short term reactivation an average of 7.2±1.7 weeks after treatment. Increased reactivation risk was associated with zone I disease (OR 6.23, 95% CI 1.35-28.7, p=0.019), lower PMA at 1st injection (OR 1.64, 95% CI 1.19-2.26; p=0.003), and lower gestational age at birth (OR 1.80, 95% CI 1.04-3.13, p=0.037). Of the 13 patients that received repeat injections, 5 required laser treatment for a second reactivation (11.6% of patients receiving IVR). No eyes developed retinal vascular occlusion, endophthalmitis or cataract.Repeat injections may be required after primary IVR for aggressive ROP. Repeat IVR treatment for ROP is effective and poses few ophthalmic adverse events, though additional reactivation remains a risk.
Reference Key
strawbridge2024shorttermretina Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Strawbridge, Jason;Cheng, John Y;Gundlach, Bradley S;Gillespie, Tessa;Karmouta, Reem;Khitri, Monica;Chu, Alison;Tsui, Irena;
Journal Retina (Philadelphia, Pa.)
Year 2024
DOI
10.1097/IAE.0000000000004206
URL
Keywords

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.