Sidelines.

Clicks: 75
ID: 279261
1996
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Popular

Ranked #14 of 18 articles by views in Nursing standard (Royal College of Nursing (Great Britain) : 1987)

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
Nurses with a flair for writing may have been tempted to combine their talents by becoming medical copywriters. But it would appear they would have no joy if they applied for a post at Lane, Earl & Cox, who describe themselves as 'one of the UK's leading healthcare advertising agencies, with a client list that's left the competition feeling pretty sick'. For their latest recruitment ad is headed 'Goat wanted for position of junior medical copywriter', and explains that a copy test will be set with the aim of separating the sheep from the goats. 'The goats will send back a copy test full of innovative, hard selling ideas and will be a pleasure to interview,' the ad concludes. 'The sheep will be sent a map of Wales.'
Reference Key
nolastname1996sidelinesnursing Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors
Journal Nursing standard (Royal College of Nursing (Great Britain) : 1987)
Year 1996
DOI
DOI not found
URL URL not found
Keywords
Breast cancer classification brca1 copy number aberration profiles

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.