Correction to: How Does the Public Evaluate Vaccines for Low‑Incidence, Severe‑Outcome Diseases? A General‑Population Choice Experiment.

Clicks: 135
ID: 279204
2023
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Steady

Ranked #4 of 5 articles by views in The patient

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
Abstract is not available for this article.
Login to Search Abstract
Reference Key
reed-johnson2023correctionthe Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Reed Johnson, F;Fairchild, Angelyn;Whittington, Dale;Srivastava, Amit K;Gonzalez, Juan Marcos;Huang, Liping;
Journal The patient
Year 2023
DOI
10.1007/s40271-023-00620-3
URL
Keywords
older adults treatment outcomes metastatic prostate cancer clinical registry real-world cohort

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.