Macular hole Delphi consensus statement (MHOST).

Clicks: 133
ID: 279188
2023
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Emerging

Ranked #9 of 9 articles by views in Acta ophthalmologica

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
To derive a Delphi method-based consensus for the surgical management of Full Thickness Macular Hole (FTMH) and Lamellar Macular Hole (LMH).37 expert VR surgeons from 21 mainly European countries participated in Delphi method-based questionnaire for diagnosis and treatment of FTMHs and LMHs.A total of 36 items were rated in round 1 by 37 participants, of which 10 items achieved consensus: intraoperative verification of PVD; clinical superiority of OCT-based FTMH classification; practical ineffectiveness of ocriplasmin; circular 360° ILM peeling for small macular holes; use of regular surgical technique for the size of the hole in concomitant retinal detachment; performing complete vitrectomy; SF6 gas as preferred tamponade; cataract surgery if crystalline lens is mildly/moderately opaque; removal of both ILM and LHEP in LMH surgery. In round 2, 18 items with moderate consensus (45-70% agreement) in round 1 were rated by 35 participants. Final consensus was reached in 35% of questions related to both diagnosis and surgical procedures.This Delphi study provides valuable information about the consensus/disagreement on different scenarios encountered during FTMH and LMH management as a guide tosurgical decision-making. High rate of disagreement and/or variable approaches still exist for treating such relatively common conditions.
Reference Key
confalonieri2023macularacta Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Confalonieri, Filippo;Haave, Hanna;Binder, Susanne;Bober, Agnieszka Monika;Bragadottir, Ragnheidur;Baerland, Thomas;Faber, Rowan;Forsaa, Vegard;Gonzalez-Lopez, Julio J;Govetto, Andrea;Haugstad, Marta;Ivastinovic, Domagoj;Jenko, Neža Čokl;Nicoară, Simona Delia;Kaljurand, Kuldar;Kozak, Igor;Kvanta, Anders;Lytvynchuk, Lyubomyr;Nawrocka, Zofia Anna;Pajic, Sanja Petrovic;Petrovič, Mojca Globočnik;Radecka, Liga;Rehak, Matus;Romano, Mario R;Ruban, Andrii;Speckauskas, Martynas;Stene-Johansen, Ingar;Stranak, Zbynek;Thaler, Angela;Thein, Anna Sophie Aagaard;Theocharis, Ioannis;Tomic, Zoran;Yan, Xiaohe;Zekolli, Muhamet;Zhuri, Burim;Znaor, Ljubo;Petrovski, Beata Eva;Kolko, Miriam;Lumi, Xhevat;Petrovski, Goran;
Journal Acta ophthalmologica
Year 2023
DOI
10.1111/aos.15682
URL
Keywords

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.