ENIGMA's simple seven: Recommendations to enhance the reproducibility of resting-state fMRI in traumatic brain injury.
Clicks: 131
ID: 278625
2024
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Star Article
30.0
/100
131 views
30 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Resting state functional magnetic resonance imaging (rsfMRI) provides researchers and clinicians with a powerful tool to examine functional connectivity across large-scale brain networks, with ever-increasing applications to the study of neurological disorders, such as traumatic brain injury (TBI). While rsfMRI holds unparalleled promise in systems neurosciences, its acquisition and analytical methodology across research groups is variable, resulting in a literature that is challenging to integrate and interpret. The focus of this narrative review is to address the primary methodological issues including investigator decision points in the application of rsfMRI to study the consequences of TBI. As part of the ENIGMA Brain Injury working group, we have collaborated to identify a minimum set of recommendations that are designed to produce results that are reliable, harmonizable, and reproducible for the TBI imaging research community. Part one of this review provides the results of a literature search of current rsfMRI studies of TBI, highlighting key design considerations and data processing pipelines. Part two outlines seven data acquisition, processing, and analysis recommendations with the goal of maximizing study reliability and between-site comparability, while preserving investigator autonomy. Part three summarizes new directions and opportunities for future rsfMRI studies in TBI patients. The goal is to galvanize the TBI community to gain consensus for a set of rigorous and reproducible methods, and to increase analytical transparency and data sharing to address the reproducibility crisis in the field.
| Reference Key |
caeyenberghs2024enigmasneuroimage
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Caeyenberghs, Karen;Imms, Phoebe;Irimia, Andrei;Monti, Martin M;Esopenko, Carrie;de Souza, Nicola L;Dominguez D, Juan F;Newsome, Mary R;Dobryakova, Ekaterina;Cwiek, Andrew;Mullin, Hollie A C;Kim, Nicholas J;Mayer, Andrew R;Adamson, Maheen M;Bickart, Kevin;Breedlove, Katherine M;Dennis, Emily L;Disner, Seth G;Haswell, Courtney;Hodges, Cooper B;Hoskinson, Kristen R;Johnson, Paula K;Königs, Marsh;Li, Lucia M;Liebel, Spencer W;Livny, Abigail;Morey, Rajendra A;Muir, Alexandra M;Olsen, Alexander;Razi, Adeel;Su, Matthew;Tate, David F;Velez, Carmen;Wilde, Elisabeth A;Zielinski, Brandon A;Thompson, Paul M;Hillary, Frank G; |
| Journal | NeuroImage. Clinical |
| Year | 2024 |
| DOI |
103585
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.