Characterizing reduced coverage regions through comparison of exome and genome sequencing data across 10 centers.
Clicks: 146
ID: 278400
2018
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Popular Article
30.0
/100
146 views
46 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
PopularRanked #8 of 10 articles by views in Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
As massively parallel sequencing is increasingly being used for clinical decision making, it has become critical to understand parameters that affect sequencing quality and to establish methods for measuring and reporting clinical sequencing standards. In this report, we propose a definition for reduced coverage regions and describe a set of standards for variant calling in clinical sequencing applications.To enable sequencing centers to assess the regions of poor sequencing quality in their own data, we optimized and used a tool (ExCID) to identify reduced coverage loci within genes or regions of particular interest. We used this framework to examine sequencing data from 500 patients generated in 10 projects at sequencing centers in the National Human Genome Research Institute/National Cancer Institute Clinical Sequencing Exploratory Research Consortium.This approach identified reduced coverage regions in clinically relevant genes, including known clinically relevant loci that were uniquely missed at individual centers, in multiple centers, and in all centers.This report provides a process road map for clinical sequencing centers looking to perform similar analyses on their data.
| Reference Key |
sanghvi2018characterizinggenetics
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Sanghvi, Rashesh V;Buhay, Christian J;Powell, Bradford C;Tsai, Ellen A;Dorschner, Michael O;Hong, Celine S;Lebo, Matthew S;Sasson, Ariella;Hanna, David S;McGee, Sean;Bowling, Kevin M;Cooper, Gregory M;Gray, David E;Lonigro, Robert J;Dunford, Andrew;Brennan, Christine A;Cibulskis, Carrie;Walker, Kimberly;Carneiro, Mauricio O;Sailsbery, Joshua;Hindorff, Lucia A;Robinson, Dan R;Santani, Avni;Sarmady, Mahdi;Rehm, Heidi L;Biesecker, Leslie G;Nickerson, Deborah A;Hutter, Carolyn M;Garraway, Levi;Muzny, Donna M;Wagle, Nikhil;, ; |
| Journal | Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics |
| Year | 2018 |
| DOI |
10.1038/gim.2017.192
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.