The Role of Imaging for GI Bleeding: ACG and SAR Consensus Recommendations.

Clicks: 160
ID: 278177
2024
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Emerging

Ranked #28 of 33 articles by views in Radiology

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
Gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding is the most common GI diagnosis leading to hospitalization within the United States. Prompt diagnosis and treatment of GI bleeding is critical to improving patient outcomes and reducing high health care utilization and costs. Radiologic techniques including CT angiography, catheter angiography, CT enterography, MR enterography, nuclear medicine red blood cell scan, and technetium-99m pertechnetate scintigraphy (Meckel scan) are frequently used to evaluate patients with GI bleeding and are complementary to GI endoscopy. However, multiple management guidelines exist, which differ in the recommended utilization of these radiologic examinations. This variability can lead to confusion as to how these tests should be used in the evaluation of GI bleeding. In this document, a panel of experts from the American College of Gastroenterology and Society of Abdominal Radiology provide a review of the radiologic examinations used to evaluate for GI bleeding including nomenclature, technique, performance, advantages, and limitations. A comparison of advantages and limitations relative to endoscopic examinations is also included. Finally, consensus statements and recommendations on technical parameters and utilization of radiologic techniques for GI bleeding are provided. © Radiological Society of North America and the American College of Gastroenterology, 2024. This article is being published concurrently in and . The articles are identical except for minor stylistic and spelling differences in keeping with each journal's style. Citations from either journal can be used when citing this article. See also the editorial by Lockhart in this issue.
Reference Key
sengupta2024theradiology Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Sengupta, Neil;Kastenberg, David M;Bruining, David H;Latorre, Melissa;Leighton, Jonathan A;Brook, Olga R;Wells, Michael L;Guglielmo, Flavius F;Naringrekar, Haresh V;Gee, Michael S;Soto, Jorge A;Park, Seong Ho;Yoo, Don C;Ramalingam, Vijay;Huete, Alvaro;Khandelwal, Ashish;Gupta, Avneesh;Allen, Brian C;Anderson, Mark A;Dane, Bari R;Sokhandon, Farnoosh;Grand, David J;Tse, Justin R;Fidler, Jeff L;
Journal Radiology
Year 2024
DOI
10.1148/radiol.232298
URL
Keywords
robot assistance simulation model industry 5.0 production and manufacturing worker fatigue

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.