The Role of Imaging for GI Bleeding: ACG and SAR Consensus Recommendations.
Clicks: 46
ID: 278177
2024
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Improving Quality
0.0
/100
Combines engagement data with AI-assessed academic quality
Reader Engagement
Emerging Content
5.7
/100
19 views
19 readers
Trending
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Abstract
Gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding is the most common GI diagnosis leading to hospitalization within the United States. Prompt diagnosis and treatment of GI bleeding is critical to improving patient outcomes and reducing high health care utilization and costs. Radiologic techniques including CT angiography, catheter angiography, CT enterography, MR enterography, nuclear medicine red blood cell scan, and technetium-99m pertechnetate scintigraphy (Meckel scan) are frequently used to evaluate patients with GI bleeding and are complementary to GI endoscopy. However, multiple management guidelines exist, which differ in the recommended utilization of these radiologic examinations. This variability can lead to confusion as to how these tests should be used in the evaluation of GI bleeding. In this document, a panel of experts from the American College of Gastroenterology and Society of Abdominal Radiology provide a review of the radiologic examinations used to evaluate for GI bleeding including nomenclature, technique, performance, advantages, and limitations. A comparison of advantages and limitations relative to endoscopic examinations is also included. Finally, consensus statements and recommendations on technical parameters and utilization of radiologic techniques for GI bleeding are provided. © Radiological Society of North America and the American College of Gastroenterology, 2024. This article is being published concurrently in and . The articles are identical except for minor stylistic and spelling differences in keeping with each journal's style. Citations from either journal can be used when citing this article. See also the editorial by Lockhart in this issue.
Abstract Quality Issue:
This abstract appears to be incomplete or contains metadata (236 words).
Try re-searching for a better abstract.
| Reference Key |
sengupta2024theradiology
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Sengupta, Neil;Kastenberg, David M;Bruining, David H;Latorre, Melissa;Leighton, Jonathan A;Brook, Olga R;Wells, Michael L;Guglielmo, Flavius F;Naringrekar, Haresh V;Gee, Michael S;Soto, Jorge A;Park, Seong Ho;Yoo, Don C;Ramalingam, Vijay;Huete, Alvaro;Khandelwal, Ashish;Gupta, Avneesh;Allen, Brian C;Anderson, Mark A;Dane, Bari R;Sokhandon, Farnoosh;Grand, David J;Tse, Justin R;Fidler, Jeff L; |
| Journal | Radiology |
| Year | 2024 |
| DOI |
10.1148/radiol.232298
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.