Continuing professional development opportunities for Australian endorsed for scheduled medicines podiatrists-What's out there and is it accessible, relevant, and meaningful? A cross-sectional survey.
Clicks: 136
ID: 277040
2023
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Emerging Content
30.0
/100
136 views
35 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
EmergingRanked #1,947 of 2,056 articles by views in PloS one
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 2,056 in total.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Non-medical prescribing is a valuable strategy to enable equitable access to medications in the context of the increasing demands on health services globally. Australian podiatrists have been able to seek endorsement for scheduled medicines (ESM) for over a decade. This project investigates the perceptions and habits of ESM podiatrists in meeting the extra continuing professional development (CPD) requirements associated with their ESM status.Australian ESM podiatrists completed an anonymous, online survey capturing demographics; CPD engagement; and self-reflections of CPD activities.Twenty percent (n = 33) of Australian ESM registered podiatrists (N = 167) responded to the survey (18 female; median ESM status 2.5 years, (IQR 1.0, 9.0)). For the previous registration period, 88% (n = 29) completed the mandatory CPD hours, with only 35% (n = 11) completing a CPD learning goal plan. Over 80% identified their last ESM CPD activity as accessible, affordable, and could recommend to colleagues. Conversely, 50% or less agreed the activity increased confidence; changed their practice; improved communication skills; or enabled networking. Most respondents (81%, n = 27) indicated improvements should be made to the content, relevance, accessibility, and meaningfulness of CPD. These findings were supported by responses to the open-ended questions.Our findings suggest ESM podiatrists engage in CPD that is accessible rather than learning goal driven. Concerningly, CPD activities resulted in low translation of learnings to practice. This brings in to question the value of mandatory CPD systems based on minimum hours, rather than meaningfulness.
| Reference Key |
martin2023continuingplos
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Martin, Saraid E;Graham, Kristin;Banwell, Helen A;Johnson, Jacinta L; |
| Journal | PloS one |
| Year | 2023 |
| DOI |
e0289217
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.