Performance of ChatGPT on USMLE: Potential for AI-assisted medical education using large language models

Clicks: 418
ID: 276480
2023
Free PDF
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Steady

Ranked #1 of 3 articles by views in PLOS Digital Health

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
We evaluated the performance of a large language model called ChatGPT on the United States Medical Licensing Exam (USMLE), which consists of three exams: Step 1, Step 2CK, and Step 3. ChatGPT performed at or near the passing threshold for all three exams without any specialized training or reinforcement. Additionally, ChatGPT demonstrated a high level of concordance and insight in its explanations. These results suggest that large language models may have the potential to assist with medical education, and potentially, clinical decision-making. Author summary Artificial intelligence (AI) systems hold great promise to improve medical care and health outcomes. As such, it is crucial to ensure that the development of clinical AI is guided by the principles of trust and explainability. Measuring AI medical knowledge in comparison to that of expert human clinicians is a critical first step in evaluating these qualities. To accomplish this, we evaluated the performance of ChatGPT, a language-based AI, on the United States Medical Licensing Exam (USMLE). The USMLE is a set of three standardized tests of expert-level knowledge, which are required for medical licensure in the United States. We found that ChatGPT performed at or near the passing threshold of 60% accuracy. Being the first to achieve this benchmark, this marks a notable milestone in AI maturation. Impressively, ChatGPT was able to achieve this result without specialized input from human trainers. Furthermore, ChatGPT displayed comprehensible reasoning and valid clinical insights, lending increased confidence to trust and explainability. Our study suggests that large language models such as ChatGPT may potentially assist human learners in a medical education setting, as a prelude to future integration into clinical decision-making.
Reference Key
kung2023performanceplos Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Kung, Tiffany H.;Cheatham, Morgan;Medenilla, Arielle;Sillos, Czarina;Leon, Lorie De;Elepaño, Camille;Madriaga, Maria;Aggabao, Rimel;Diaz-Candido, Giezel;Maningo, James;Tseng, Victor;
Journal PLOS Digital Health
Year 2023
DOI
DOI not found
URL
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9931230/?tool=EBI
Keywords
Education Biology (General) Medicine (General) Medicine Information technology Biotechnology Computer applications to medicine. Medical informatics environmental effects of industries and plants renewable energy sources environmental sciences special aspects of education political science (general) astronomy geophysics. cosmic physics political institutions and public administration - asia (asian studies only)

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.