Chromium(III) Removal from Nickel(II)-Containing Waste Solutions as a Pretreatment Step in a Hydrometallurgical Process.

Clicks: 192
ID: 276089
2022
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Emerging

Ranked #596 of 812 articles by views in Materials (Basel, Switzerland)

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 812 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
This paper presents Cr(III) removal from nickel sulfate waste solutions as a pretreatment step for the modification of hydrogen storage alloys. Adsorption with two cation exchange resins, Dowex G26 (strongly acidic) and MAC-3 (weakly acidic), and precipitation with various solutions were chosen as simple operations for Cr(III) removal from waste solutions. The adsorption of Cr(III) was investigated for both model and real waste nickel solutions. Dowex G26 appeared to be more efficient in Cr(III) removal (R from 43 to 80%) than MAC-3 (R from 40 to 53%). However, the adsorption from multi-component solutions (presence of Co(II), Ni(II) and Cr(III)) showed no selectivity in Cr(III) adsorption in comparison to those of Co(II) and Ni(II). Cr(III), Ni(II) and Co(II) were removed at a comparable level (30-36%) from a three-component solution of 10 g/dm of each metal ion, and a 56-72% removal of these ions was achieved from the real solution. Therefore, the precipitation of Cr(III) was carried out from a real waste nickel solution to compare its performance with adsorption. The best precipitation solution appeared to be 3 and 30% NaOH due to the quantitative precipitation of Cr(OH) at pH 5 and relatively small co-precipitation of Ni(II) and Co(II) hydroxides (P = 20-52%, P = 0-54%). Based on the results of the research, it can be concluded that precipitation with a NaOH solution is an efficient pretreatment operation of an electrolyte for further steps of the hydrometallurgical process of nickel electrodeposition and appears to be more selective in the elimination of Cr(III) than adsorption with Dowex G26 resin.
Reference Key
kostrzewa2022chromiumiiimaterials Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Kostrzewa, Milena;Staszak, Katarzyna;Ginter-Kramarczyk, Dobrochna;Kruszelnicka, Izabela;Góra, Wojciech;Baraniak, Marek;Lota, Grzegorz;Regel-Rosocka, Magdalena;
Journal Materials (Basel, Switzerland)
Year 2022
DOI
6217
URL
Keywords
adsorption nickel precipitation hydrometallurgy chromium removal ion-exchange resin waste solutions

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.