COVID-19 versus SARS: A comparative review

Clicks: 312
ID: 274474
2021
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Emerging

Ranked #16 of 23 articles by views in journal of infection and public health

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
The two genetically similar severe acute respiratory syndrome coronaviruses, SARS-CoV-1 and SARS-CoV-2, have each been responsible for global epidemics of vastly different scales. Although both viruses arose from similar origins, they quickly diverged due to differences in their transmission dynamic …
Reference Key
as2021journalcovid-19 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Keshta AS;Mallah SI;Al Zubaidi K;Ghorab OK;Keshta MS;Alarabi D;Abousaleh MA;Salman MT;Taha OE;Zeidan AA;Elsaid MF;Tang P;;
Journal journal of infection and public health
Year 2021
DOI
DOI not found
URL
Keywords

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.