COVID-19 versus SARS: A comparative review
Clicks: 312
ID: 274474
2021
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Emerging Content
30.0
/100
312 views
37 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
EmergingRanked #16 of 23 articles by views in journal of infection and public health
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
The two genetically similar severe acute respiratory syndrome coronaviruses, SARS-CoV-1 and SARS-CoV-2, have each been responsible for global epidemics of vastly different scales. Although both viruses arose from similar origins, they quickly diverged due to differences in their transmission dynamic …
Abstract Quality Issue:
This abstract appears to be incomplete or contains metadata (40 words).
Try re-searching for a better abstract.
| Reference Key |
as2021journalcovid-19
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Keshta AS;Mallah SI;Al Zubaidi K;Ghorab OK;Keshta MS;Alarabi D;Abousaleh MA;Salman MT;Taha OE;Zeidan AA;Elsaid MF;Tang P;; |
| Journal | journal of infection and public health |
| Year | 2021 |
| DOI |
DOI not found
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.