Clinical review: Update on hemodynamic monitoring - a consensus of 16 - Critical Care

Clicks: 237
ID: 273471
2011
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Steady

Ranked #12 of 17 articles by views in critical care

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Hemodynamic monitoring plays a fundamental role in the management of acutely ill patients. With increased concerns about the use of invasive techniques, notably the pulmonary artery catheter, to measure cardiac output, recent years have seen an influx of new, less-invasive means of measuring hemodynamic variables, leaving the clinician somewhat bewildered as to which technique, if any, is best and which he/she should use. In this consensus paper, we try to provide some clarification, offering an objective review of the available monitoring systems, including their specific advantages and limitations, and highlighting some key principles underlying hemodynamic monitoring in critically ill patients.
Reference Key
jean-louis2011criticalclinical Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Vincent, Jean-Louis;Rhodes, Andrew;Perel, Azriel;Martin, Greg S;Rocca, Giorgio Della;Vallet, Benoit;Pinsky, Michael R;Hofer, Christoph K;Teboul, Jean-Louis;de Boode, Willem-Pieter;Scolletta, Sabino;Vieillard-Baron, Antoine;De Backer, Daniel;Walley, Keith R;Maggiorini, Marco;Singer, Mervyn;Vincent, Jean-Louis;Rhodes, Andrew;Perel, Azriel;Martin, Greg S;Rocca, Giorgio Della;Vallet, Benoit;Pinsky, Michael R;Hofer, Christoph K;Teboul, Jean-Louis;de Boode, Willem-Pieter;Scolletta, Sabino;Vieillard-Baron, Antoine;De Backer, Daniel;Walley, Keith R;Maggiorini, Marco;Singer, Mervyn;
Journal critical care
Year 2011
DOI
doi:10.1186/cc10291
URL
Keywords

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.