SLIC superpixels compared to state-of-the-art superpixel methods

Clicks: 345
ID: 273190
2012
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Star

Ranked #14 of 23 articles by views in ieee transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Computer vision applications have come to rely increasingly on superpixels in recent years, but it is not always clear what constitutes a good superpixel algorithm. In an effort to understand the benefits and drawbacks of existing methods, we empirically compare five state-of-the-art superpixel algo …
Reference Key
r2012ieeeslic Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Achanta R;Shaji A;Smith K;Lucchi A;Fua P;Süsstrunk S;;
Journal ieee transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence
Year 2012
DOI
DOI not found
URL
Keywords

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.