SLIC superpixels compared to state-of-the-art superpixel methods

Clicks: 322
ID: 273190
2012
Free PDF
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality Improving Quality
0.0 /100
Combines engagement data with AI-assessed academic quality
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
Computer vision applications have come to rely increasingly on superpixels in recent years, but it is not always clear what constitutes a good superpixel algorithm. In an effort to understand the benefits and drawbacks of existing methods, we empirically compare five state-of-the-art superpixel algo …
Reference Key
r2012ieeeslic Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Achanta R;Shaji A;Smith K;Lucchi A;Fua P;Süsstrunk S;;
Journal ieee transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence
Year 2012
DOI
DOI not found
URL
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22641706
Keywords
National Center for Biotechnology Information NCBI NLM MEDLINE pubmed abstract nih national institutes of health national library of medicine reproducibility of results research support non-u.s. gov't Comparative Study sensitivity and specificity computer-assisted* computer-assisted / methods* pattern recognition automated / methods* algorithms* image enhancement / methods* image interpretation signal processing pmid:22641706 doi:10.1109/tpami.2012.120 radhakrishna achanta appu shaji sabine süsstrunk

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.