USE OF RECOMBINANT ANTIGENS FOR DETECTION OF TOXOPLASMA GONDII INFECTION IN SWINE

Clicks: 103
ID: 273139
2000
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Five recombinant Toxoplasma gondii antigens, designated B427, C51, C55, V22, and MBP30 were assessed for their potential use in an enzyme-linked immunoassay (EIA) for detection of T. gondii infection in swine. The antigens were evaluated with sera from young pigs that had been fed 1–10,000 T. gondii oocysts of the VEG or GT-1 strains. Results were compared with an EIA using a native T. gondii antigen extract. All 5 recombinant antigens, as well as native antigen, detected antibody responses as soon as 3 wk after infection in pigs inoculated with 1 or 10 oocysts of the VEG strain. This antibody response persisted, at varying levels, for 14 wk when the experiment was terminated. All antigens also detected antibody responses in pigs 4 wk after inoculation with 10,000 oocysts of the GT-1 strain. The antibody response recognized by native antigen remained high through 51 wk after inoculation. However, there was considerable animal-to-animal variation in responses to the individual recombinant antigens. Only antigens C51 and MBP30 consistently detected a positive antibody response over the entire 51-wk course of the experiment. These results suggest that these antigens might be useful for the serological detection of T. gondii infection in pigs.
Reference Key
gamble2000https://doi.org/10.1645/0022-3395(2000)086[0459:uorafd]2.0.co;2use Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors H. Ray Gamble;Carolyn D. Andrews;J. P. Dubey;Donald W. Webert;Stephen F. Parmley;H. Ray Gamble;Carolyn D. Andrews;J. P. Dubey;Donald W. Webert;Stephen F. Parmley;
Journal https://doi.org/10.1645/0022-3395(2000)086[0459:UORAFD]2.0.CO;2
Year 2000
DOI
10.1645/0022-3395(2000)086[0459:UORAFD]2.0.CO;2
URL
Keywords

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.