Single Versus Double-Sided Hypotheses and Probabilities

Clicks: 250
ID: 272955
2021
Free PDF
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Steady

Ranked #6 of 8 articles by views in Pediatric emergency care

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
These articles demonstrate how single-sided versus double-sided probability issues can cause researchers to draw inaccurate conclusions. As such, we would urge that this be more rigorously evaluated when the P values are between 0.05 and 0.10.
Reference Key
ma2021pediatricsingle Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Murata MA;Yamamoto LG;;
Journal Pediatric emergency care
Year 2021
DOI
DOI not found
URL
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34116549
Keywords
National Center for Biotechnology Information NCBI NLM MEDLINE review humans pubmed abstract nih national institutes of health national library of medicine adult Child computer simulation probability pmid:34116549 doi:10.1097/pec.0000000000002477 michelle a murata loren g yamamoto resuscitation*

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.