A Review of the Tools Used for Marine Monitoring in the UK: Combining Historic and Contemporary Methods with Modeling and Socioeconomics to Fulfill Legislative Needs and Scientific Ambitions

Clicks: 242
ID: 271938
2017
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Steady

Ranked #22 of 49 articles by views in frontiers in marine science

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Marine environmental monitoring is undertaken to provide evidence that environmental management targets are being met. Moreover, monitoring also provides context to marine science and over the last century has allowed development of a critical scientific understanding of the marine environment and the impacts that humans are having on it. The seas around the UK are currently monitored by targeted, impact-driven, programmes (e.g. fishery or pollution based monitoring) often using traditional techniques, many of which have not changed significantly since the early 1900s. The advent of a new wave of automated technology, in combination with changing political and economic circumstances, means that there is currently a strong drive to move towards a more refined, efficient, and effective way of monitoring. We describe the policy and scientific rationale for monitoring our seas, alongside a comprehensive description of the types of equipment and methodology currently used and the technologies that are likely to be used in the future. We contextualise the way new technologies and methodologies may impact monitoring and discuss how whole ecosystems models can give an integrated, comprehensive approach to impact assessment. Furthermore, we discuss how an understanding of the value of each data point is crucial to assess the true costs and benefits to society of a marine monitoring programme.
Reference Key
p.2017frontiersa Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Bean, Tim P.;Greenwood, Naomi;Beckett, Rachel;Biermann, Lauren;Bignell, John P.;Brant, Jan L.;Copp, Gordon H.;Devlin, Michelle J.;Dye, Stephen;Feist, Stephen W.;Fernand, Liam;Foden, Dean;Hyder, Kieran;Jenkins, Chris M.;van der Kooij, Jeroen;Kröger, Silke;Kupschus, Sven;Leech, Clare;Leonard, Kinson S.;Lynam, Christopher P.;Lyons, Brett P.;Maes, Thomas;Nicolaus, E. E. Manuel;Malcolm, Stephen J.;McIlwaine, Paul;Merchant, Nathan D.;Paltriguera, Lucille;Pearce, David J.;Pitois, Sophie G.;Stebbing, Paul D.;Townhill, Bryony;Ware, Suzanne;Williams, Oliver;Righton, David;
Journal frontiers in marine science
Year 2017
DOI
doi:10.3389/fmars.2017.00263
URL
Keywords

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.