Live, Love, Juul: User and Content Analysis of Twitter Posts about Juul

Clicks: 361
ID: 271866
2019
Free PDF
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Steady

Ranked #6 of 8 articles by views in american journal of health behavior

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
Objectives: In this study, we identified patterns of communication around Juul use and users on Twitter.Methods: Public tweets were collected from April 27, 2018 until June 27, 2018. We categorized 1008 randomly selected tweets on 4 dimensions: user type, sentiment, genre, and theme. …
Reference Key
a2019americanlive, Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Malik A;Li Y;Karbasian H;Hamari J;Johri A;;
Journal american journal of health behavior
Year 2019
DOI
DOI not found
URL
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=30808472&dopt=Abstract
Keywords
qualitative research National Center for Biotechnology Information NCBI NLM MEDLINE humans pubmed abstract nih national institutes of health national library of medicine research support u.s. gov't non-p.h.s. adult female male young adult smoking* social media* electronic nicotine delivery systems* pmid:30808472 doi:10.5993/ajhb.43.2.9 aqdas malik yisheng li aditya johri

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.