The impact of atlas-based MR attenuation correction on the diagnosis of FDG-PET/MR for Alzheimer’s diseases— A simulation study combining multi-center data and ADNI-data

Clicks: 299
ID: 271505
2020
Free PDF
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Emerging

Ranked #1,061 of 2,056 articles by views in PloS one

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 2,056 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
Background The purpose of this study was to assess the impact of vendor-provided atlas-based MRAC on FDG PET/MR for the evaluation of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) by using simulated images. Methods We recruited 47 patients, from two institutions, who underwent PET/CT and PET/MR (GE SIGNA) examination for oncological staging. From the PET raw data acquired on PET/MR, two FDG-PET series were generated, using vendor-provided MRAC (atlas-based) and CTAC. The following simulation steps were performed in MNI space: After spatial normalization and smoothing of the PET datasets, we calculated the error map for each patient, PETMRAC/PETCTAC. We multiplied each of these 47 error maps with each of the 203 Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) cases after the identical normalization and smoothing. This resulted in 203*47 = 9541 datasets. To evaluate the probability of AD in each resulting image, a cumulative t-value was calculated automatically using commercially-available software (PMOD PALZ) which has been used in multiple large cohort studies. The diagnostic accuracy for the discrimination of AD and predicting progression from mild cognitive impairment (MCI) to AD were evaluated in simulated images compared with ADNI original images. Results The accuracy and specificity for the discrimination of AD-patients from normal controls were not substantially impaired, but sensitivity was slightly impaired in 5 out of 47 datasets (original vs. error; 83.2% [CI 75.0%-89.0%], 83.3% [CI 74.2%-89.8%] and 83.1% [CI 75.6%-88.3%] vs. 82.7% [range 80.4–85.0%], 78.5% [range 72.9–83.3%,] and 86.1% [range 81.4–89.8%]). The accuracy, sensitivity and specificity for predicting progression from MCI to AD during 2-year follow-up was not impaired (original vs. error; 62.5% [CI 53.3%-69.3%], 78.8% [CI 65.4%-88.6%] and 54.0% [CI 47.0%-69.1%] vs. 64.8% [range 61.5–66.7%], 75.7% [range 66.7–81.8%,] and 59.0% [range 50.8–63.5%]). The worst 3 error maps show a tendency towards underestimation of PET scores. Conclusion FDG-PET/MR based on atlas-based MR attenuation correction showed similar diagnostic accuracy to the CT-based method for the diagnosis of AD and the prediction of progression of MCI to AD using commercially-available software, although with a minor reduction in sensitivity.
Reference Key
sekine2020plosthe Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Tetsuro Sekine;Alfred Buck;Gaspar Delso;Bradley Kemp;Edwin E. G. W. ter Voert;Martin Huellner;Patrick Veit-Haibach;Sandeep Kaushik;Florian Wiesinger;Geoffrey Warnock;for the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative;
Journal PloS one
Year 2020
DOI
10.1371/journal.pone.0233886
URL
http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0233886
Keywords
Magnetic resonance imaging positron emission tomography neuroimaging cognitive impairment alzheimer's disease cartography diagnostic medicine alzheimer's disease diagnosis and management

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.