Design and end points of clinical trials for patients with progressive prostate cancer and castrate levels of testosterone: recommendations of the Prostate Cancer Clinical Trials Working Group

Clicks: 400
ID: 271175
2008
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Steady

Ranked #10 of 24 articles by views in journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the american society of clinical oncology

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
PCWG2 recommends increasing emphasis on time-to-event end points (ie, failure to progress) as decision aids in proceeding from phase II to phase III trials. Recommendations will evolve as data are generated on the utility of intermediate end points to predict clinical benefit.
Reference Key
hi2008journaldesign Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Scher HI;Halabi S;Tannock I;Morris M;Sternberg CN;Carducci MA;Eisenberger MA;Higano C;Bubley GJ;Dreicer R;Petrylak D;Kantoff P;Basch E;Kelly WK;Figg WD;Small EJ;Beer TM;Wilding G;Martin A;Hussain M; ;;
Journal journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the american society of clinical oncology
Year 2008
DOI
DOI not found
URL
Keywords

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.