Opinion: How to ensure regulations don’t stymie much-needed COVID-19 point-of-care testing
Clicks: 166
ID: 270997
2021
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Improving Quality
0.0
/100
Combines engagement data with AI-assessed academic quality
Reader Engagement
Emerging Content
5.7
/100
19 views
19 readers
Trending
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Abstract
The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has raged for more than a year in the United States, upending life as we knew it. Nevertheless, we have seen incredibly rapid advances in vaccines, therapeutics, and diagnostic testing technology. There is tremendous need and economic interest in reopening our businesses and schools and in resuming gatherings for entertainment and sporting events. To accomplish this, we need a strong multifaceted strategy. Already, widespread vaccination is well underway. But those efforts must be coupled with aggressive community-based COVID point-of-care testing so that any case of asymptomatic infection, especially in the most transmissible phase, is rapidly identified (1).
We must devise more sensible regulations that meet the moment, allowing for rapid, widespread COVID-19 point-of-care testing. Image credit: Shutterstock/zstock.
Corporate and federal support of medical diagnostic companies has fueled innovative, easy-to-use, inexpensive, point-of-care COVID-19 viral tests with multiple different technologies. The retail cost of these tests is now as low as $5 per unit, and they have become as easy to use as a home pregnancy test. Unfortunately, it’s not enough.
The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has expedited the evaluation and granting of Emergency Use Authorizations (EUAs), ensuring that newly developed tests meeting validation criteria come to market promptly. However, similar to COVID vaccine distribution “last mile” barriers, there remain significant challenges to the real-world implementation of rapid, point-of-care testing. These remain despite the FDA, in July 2020, issuing an EUA application template for at-home and over-the-counter (OTC) tests for nonlab settings, such as homes, offices, or …
[↵][1]1To whom correspondence may be addressed. Email: clare.rock{at}jhmi.edu.
[1]: #xref-corresp-1-1
| Reference Key |
rock2021proceedingsopinion:
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Clare Rock;Jonathan Zenilman;Clare Rock;Jonathan Zenilman; |
| Journal | proceedings of the national academy of sciences |
| Year | 2021 |
| DOI |
10.1073/pnas.2109012118
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
|
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.