Multiple imputation for missing data in epidemiological and clinical research: potential and pitfalls
Clicks: 137
ID: 270902
2009
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Star Article
30.0
/100
137 views
19 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
StarRanked #2 of 4 articles by views in the bmj
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Most studies have some missing data. Jonathan Sterne and colleagues describe the appropriate use and reporting of the multiple imputation approach to dealing with them
Abstract Quality Issue:
This abstract appears to be incomplete or contains metadata (25 words).
Try re-searching for a better abstract.
| Reference Key |
carpenter2009themultiple
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Jonathan A C Sterne, Ian R White, John B Carlin, Michael Spratt, Patrick Royston, Michael G Kenward, Angela M Wood, James R Carpenter;Jonathan A C Sterne;Ian R White;John B Carlin;Michael Spratt;Patrick Royston;Michael G Kenward;Angela M Wood;James R Carpenter; |
| Journal | the bmj |
| Year | 2009 |
| DOI |
10.1136/bmj.b2393
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
|
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.