A model for the evaluation of computerised codes. The Gabrieli Medical Nomenclature as an example

Clicks: 350
ID: 270897
1997
Free PDF
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Star

Ranked #1 of 25 articles by views in australian family physician

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
The objective of this article was to evaluate the Gabrieli Medical Nomenclature (GMN) as a coding system for primary care, using a system of five criteria. These were: the infrastructure supporting the coding system; the code structure; ease of use of the codes; the reproducibility of coding; the us …
Reference Key
p1997australiana Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Bolton P;Mira M;Usher H;Prior G;;
Journal australian family physician
Year 1997
DOI
DOI not found
URL
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9254946
Keywords
australia National Center for Biotechnology Information NCBI NLM MEDLINE humans pubmed abstract nih national institutes of health national library of medicine reproducibility of results research support non-u.s. gov't terminology as topic* evaluation studies as topic family practice* medical records systems p bolton g prior pmid:9254946 m mira computerized / standards*

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.