Measurement of |Vub| near the endpoint of the electron momentum spectrum from semileptonic B-meson decays
Clicks: 235
ID: 270594
2005
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Emerging Content
30.0
/100
235 views
63 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
EmergingRanked #110 of 201 articles by views in physics letters b
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 201 in total.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
We report measurements of partial branching fractions of inclusive charmless semileptonic B-meson decays at the endpoint of the electron momentum spectrum. The measurements are made in six overlapping momentum intervals that have lower bounds ranging from 1.9 to 2.4 GeV/c and a common upper bound of 2.6 GeV/c, as measured in the centre of mass frame. The results are based on a sample of 29 million BB¯ pairs, accumulated by the Belle detector at the KEKB asymmetric e+e− collider operating on the ϒ(4S) resonance. In the momentum interval ranging from 1.9 to 2.6 GeV/c we measure the partial branching fraction ΔB(B→Xueνe)=(8.47±0.37±1.53)×10−4, where the first error is statistical and the second is systematic. A prediction of the partial rate R=(21.69±3.62−1.98+2.18)|Vub|2ps−1 in this momentum interval based on theory is calculated with input HQET parameters that have been derived from Belle's measurement of the B→Xsγ photon energy spectrum, where the first error is due to the uncertainty on HQET parameters and the second error is from theory. Using both ΔB(B→Xueνe) and R we find |Vub|=(5.08±0.47±0.42−0.23+0.26)×10−3, where the first error is from the partial branching fraction, and the second and third errors are from uncertainties in R.
| Reference Key |
Žontar2005physicsmeasurement
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | A. Limosani,K. Abe,I. Adachi,Hiroaki Aihara,Y. Asano,T. Aushev,S. Bahinipati,A.M. Bakich,Elisabetta Barberio,U. Bitenc,I. Bizjak,S. Blyth,A. Bondar,Andrzej Bożek,M. Bračko,Jolanta Brodzicka,T.E. Browder,Y. Chao,A. Chen,Kai-Feng Chen,W.T. Chen,B.G. Cheon,R. Chistov,Y. Choi,A. Chuvikov,S. Cole,Jeremy Dalseno,M. Danilov,M. Dash,J. Dragic,A. Drutskoy,S. Eidelman,S. Fratina,N. Gabyshev,T. Gershon,G. Gokhroo,B. Golob,A. Gorišek,Takanori Hara,N.C. Hastings,K. Hayasaka,H. Hayashii,M. Hazumi,L. Hinz,T. Hokuue,Y. Hoshi,S. Hou,W.-S. Hou,T. Iijima,A. Imoto,K. Inami,Akimasa Ishikawa,R. Itoh,Masako Iwasaki,J.H. Kang,N. Katayama,H. Kawai,T. Kawasaki,H.R. Khan,H. Kichimi,H.J. Kim,S.K. Kim,K. Kinoshita,S. Korpar,Pavel Krokovny,R. Kulasiri,S. Kumar,C.C. Kuo,Y.-J. Kwon,J.S. Lange,G. Leder,Tadeusz Lesiak,J. Li,S.-W. Lin,D. Liventsev,J. MacNaughton,G. Majumder,F. Mandl,T. Matsumoto,Y. Mikami,W. Mitaroff,K. Miyabayashi,H. Miyake,H. Miyata,R. Mizuk,D. Mohapatra,T. Mori,T. Nagamine,Y. Nagasaka,E. Nakano,M. Nakao,Z. Natkaniec,Shohei Nishida,O. Nitoh,T. Nozaki,S. Ogawa,T. Ohshima,T. Okabe,S. Okuno,S.L. Olsen,Y. Onuki,W. Ostrowicz,H. Ozaki,H. Palka,C.W. Park,H. Park,N. Parslow,R. Pestotnik,Leo Piilonen,F.J. Ronga,H. Sagawa,Y. Sakai,N. Sato,T. Schietinger,Olivier Schneider,C. Schwanda,R. Seuster,M.E. Sevior,H. Shibuya,B. Shwartz,V. Sidorov,A. Somov,R. Stamen,S. Stanič,M. Starič,K. Sumisawa,Takayuki Sumiyoshi,S.Y. Suzuki,O. Tajima,F. Takasaki,K. Tamai,N. Tamura,M. Tanaka,Y. Teramoto,X.C. Tian,T. Tsukamoto,S. Uehara,K. Ueno,T. Uglov,S. Uno,Phillip Urquijo,G. Varner,K.E. Varvell,S. Villa,C.C. Wang,M.-Z. Wang,Q.L. Xie,Bruce Yabsley,A. Yamaguchi,H. Yamamoto,Y. Yamashita,M. Yamauchi,J. Ying,J. Zhang,L.M. Zhang,Z.P. Zhang,D. Žontar;A. Limosani;K. Abe;I. Adachi;Hiroaki Aihara;Y. Asano;T. Aushev;S. Bahinipati;A.M. Bakich;Elisabetta Barberio;U. Bitenc;I. Bizjak;S. Blyth;A. Bondar;Andrzej Bożek;M. Bračko;Jolanta Brodzicka;T.E. Browder;Y. Chao;A. Chen;Kai-Feng Chen;W.T. Chen;B.G. Cheon;R. Chistov;Y. Choi;A. Chuvikov;S. Cole;Jeremy Dalseno;M. Danilov;M. Dash;J. Dragic;A. Drutskoy;S. Eidelman;S. Fratina;N. Gabyshev;T. Gershon;G. Gokhroo;B. Golob;A. Gorišek;Takanori Hara;N.C. Hastings;K. Hayasaka;H. Hayashii;M. Hazumi;L. Hinz;T. Hokuue;Y. Hoshi;S. Hou;W.-S. Hou;T. Iijima;A. Imoto;K. Inami;Akimasa Ishikawa;R. Itoh;Masako Iwasaki;J.H. Kang;N. Katayama;H. Kawai;T. Kawasaki;H.R. Khan;H. Kichimi;H.J. Kim;S.K. Kim;K. Kinoshita;S. Korpar;Pavel Krokovny;R. Kulasiri;S. Kumar;C.C. Kuo;Y.-J. Kwon;J.S. Lange;G. Leder;Tadeusz Lesiak;J. Li;S.-W. Lin;D. Liventsev;J. MacNaughton;G. Majumder;F. Mandl;T. Matsumoto;Y. Mikami;W. Mitaroff;K. Miyabayashi;H. Miyake;H. Miyata;R. Mizuk;D. Mohapatra;T. Mori;T. Nagamine;Y. Nagasaka;E. Nakano;M. Nakao;Z. Natkaniec;Shohei Nishida;O. Nitoh;T. Nozaki;S. Ogawa;T. Ohshima;T. Okabe;S. Okuno;S.L. Olsen;Y. Onuki;W. Ostrowicz;H. Ozaki;H. Palka;C.W. Park;H. Park;N. Parslow;R. Pestotnik;Leo Piilonen;F.J. Ronga;H. Sagawa;Y. Sakai;N. Sato;T. Schietinger;Olivier Schneider;C. Schwanda;R. Seuster;M.E. Sevior;H. Shibuya;B. Shwartz;V. Sidorov;A. Somov;R. Stamen;S. Stanič;M. Starič;K. Sumisawa;Takayuki Sumiyoshi;S.Y. Suzuki;O. Tajima;F. Takasaki;K. Tamai;N. Tamura;M. Tanaka;Y. Teramoto;X.C. Tian;T. Tsukamoto;S. Uehara;K. Ueno;T. Uglov;S. Uno;Phillip Urquijo;G. Varner;K.E. Varvell;S. Villa;C.C. Wang;M.-Z. Wang;Q.L. Xie;Bruce Yabsley;A. Yamaguchi;H. Yamamoto;Y. Yamashita;M. Yamauchi;J. Ying;J. Zhang;L.M. Zhang;Z.P. Zhang;D. Žontar; |
| Journal | physics letters b |
| Year | 2005 |
| DOI |
10.1016/j.physletb.2005.06.011
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.