Community‐based Participatory Research: Benefits and Challenges in the Hollandale Fit for Life Steps Program

Clicks: 275
ID: 270384
2006
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Star

Ranked #2 of 2 articles by views in the faseb journal

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Hollandale Fit for Life Steps, a 6-month community intervention involving volunteer “coaches” leading fellow community members in walking groups, utilizes the community-based participatory research model (CBPR). CBPR may improve community interventions by empowering community members to be active partners in the research process. Community members have been involved in every research component of the program from study design development to participant recruitment and data collection. Community members were trained, attained competencies, and performed anthropometric, biological and interview-administered assessments on study participants. Data collection is occurring at enrollment, 3 months, 6 months, and at 6 months post-intervention. Challenges encountered utilizing CBPR include extensive time in developing working relationships and training community members in the research process juxtaposed with community members’ desires to see action and results quickly. Benefits of CBPR are evident in the 3 month data collection retention rates. Community members trained to be walking coaches had a 100% (8 of 8) retention rate from enrollment to 3 month data collection. Walking group participant retention rate was 95% (79 of 83) and retention of community data collectors was 60% (6 of 10). Use of CBPR has directed the university partners to focus on research questions of greatest relevance to the community. In turn, outreach beyond the short duration of the planned intervention is being realized through community members actively planning events related to the current intervention. Supported by USDA, ARS Project#6251-5300-003-00D.
Reference Key
bogle2006thecommunity‐based Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors J M Zoellner,C Connell,R Santell,T Fungwe,E Strickland,K Yadrick,A Avis,K Lofton,M Rowser,A Powers,M Bogle;J M Zoellner;C Connell;R Santell;T Fungwe;E Strickland;K Yadrick;A Avis;K Lofton;M Rowser;A Powers;M Bogle;
Journal the faseb journal
Year 2006
DOI
10.1096/fasebj.20.4.a130
URL
Keywords

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.