A Two Centre Observational Study of Simultaneous Pulse Oximetry and Arterial Oxygen Saturation Recordings in Intensive Care Unit Patients
Clicks: 288
ID: 270056
2018
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Emerging Content
30.0
/100
288 views
58 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
EmergingRanked #7 of 9 articles by views in anaesthesia and intensive care
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
The influence of variables that might affect the accuracy of pulse oximetry (SpO2) recordings in critically ill patients is not well established. We sought to describe the relationship between paired SpO2/SaO2 (oxygen saturation via arterial blood gas analysis) in adult intensive care unit (ICU) patients and to describe the diagnostic performance of SpO2 in detecting low SaO2 and PaO2. A paired SpO2/SaO2 measurement was obtained from 404 adults in ICU. Measurements were used to calculate bias, precision, and limits of agreement. Associations between bias and variables including vasopressor and inotrope use, capillary refill time, hand temperature, pulse pressure, body temperature, oximeter model, and skin colour were estimated. There was no overall statistically significant bias in paired SpO2/SaO2 measurements; observed limits of agreement were +/-4.4%. However, body temperature, oximeter model, and skin colour, were statistically significantly associated with the degree of bias. SpO2 2 2/SaO2 in adult ICU patients provides support for the use of pulse oximetry to titrate oxygen therapy. However, SpO2 recordings alone should be used cautiously when SaO2 recordings of 4.4% higher or lower than the observed SpO2 would be of concern. A range of variables relevant to the critically ill had little or no effect on bias.
| Reference Key |
young2018anaesthesiaa
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | S. J. Ebmeier,M. Barker,M. Bacon,R. C. Beasley,R. Bellomo,C. Knee Chong,G. M. Eastwood,James Gilchrist,H. Kagaya,J. Pilcher,S. K. Reddy,E. Ridgeon,N. Sarma,S. Spragas,A. Tanaka,M. Tweedie,Mark Weatherall,P. J. Young;S. J. Ebmeier;M. Barker;M. Bacon;R. C. Beasley;R. Bellomo;C. Knee Chong;G. M. Eastwood;James Gilchrist;H. Kagaya;J. Pilcher;S. K. Reddy;E. Ridgeon;N. Sarma;S. Spragas;A. Tanaka;M. Tweedie;Mark Weatherall;P. J. Young; |
| Journal | anaesthesia and intensive care |
| Year | 2018 |
| DOI |
10.1177/0310057x1804600307
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.