An evaluation of measurement techniques for algal-derived organic nitrogen.

Clicks: 98
ID: 26992
2019
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Steady

Ranked #158 of 168 articles by views in Water research

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 168 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
Algal-derived organic matter (AOM) from algal blooms in water supply systems contains dissolved organic nitrogen (DON) and dissolved organic carbon (DOC) among other constituents. The DON and DOC are disinfection by-product (DBP) precursor compounds, and must be well characterised to facilitate effective removal, thus minimising DBP formation during disinfection. While DOC character has been studied extensively, DON analysis suffers from inaccuracies due to sample pre-treatment and instrument sensitivities. A liquid chromatography method that combines size exclusion chromatography with highly sensitive organic carbon and nitrogen detectors (LC-OCND) has been widely adopted for DOC analysis; however, its potential for application for DON charactersation has been suggested as a viable alternative to existing DON characterisation techniquesnot been assessed despite its potential. Hence, the aim was to compare the effectiveness of conventional total dissolved N-dissolved inorganic N (TN-DIN), and LC-OCND methods for analysing DON in AOM. A suite of N-containing model compounds representative of DON and AOM extracted from Chlorella vulgaris CS-42/7 and Microcystis aeruginosa CS-555/1 were used to evaluate the techniques. The DON of both model compounds and AOM was first analysed using the conventional method and, then, via LC-OCND. It was observed that LC-OCND had a better precision for DON when TN contained more DIN. LC-OCND provided direct quantitative measurements for bulk and fractionated DON and DIN, with little interference caused by DIN. Additionally, LC-OCND provided information on MW distribution and protein content of the AOM. For example, LC-OCND results showed that M. aeruginosa AOM contained more HMW material than C. vulgaris AOM. However, as LC-OCND uses UV oxidation, it could not completely oxidise complex aromatic structures, and thus had a lower recovery for HMW model compounds and algal DON in comparison to the conventional method that used high temperature catalytic oxidation. Overall, it is advised that a combination of LC-OCND and TN analysis be used to provide a more detailed characterisation of N-containing AOM and other similar HMW aquatic NOM samples.
Reference Key
li2019anwater Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Li, X;Rao, N R H;Linge, K L;Joll, C A;Khan, S;Henderson, R K;
Journal Water research
Year 2019
DOI
S0043-1354(19)30772-9
URL
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.