An Improved Limit on Pauli-Exclusion-Principle Forbidden Atomic Transitions

Clicks: 163
ID: 269370
2012
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Star

Ranked #2 of 2 articles by views in foundations of physics

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
We have examined the atomic theory behind recent constraints on the violation of the Pauli Exclusion Principle derived from experiments that look for X-rays emitted from conductors while a large current is present. We also re-examine the assumptions underlying such experiments. We use the results of these studies to assess pilot measurements to develop an improved test of the Principle. We present an improved limit of \(\frac{1}{2}\beta^{2} < 2.6\times10^{-39}\) on the Pauli Exclusion Principle. This limit is the best to date for interactions between a system of fermions and a fermion that has not previously interacted with that given system. That is, for systems that do not obviously violate the Messiah-Greenberg symmetrization-postulate selection rule.
Reference Key
chen2012foundationsan Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors S. R. Elliott,B. H. Laroque,V. M. Gehman,M. F. Kidd,M. Chen;S. R. Elliott;B. H. Laroque;V. M. Gehman;M. F. Kidd;M. Chen;
Journal foundations of physics
Year 2012
DOI
10.1007/s10701-012-9643-y
URL
Keywords

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.