Multiple-electron ionization, capture, and loss by 19-MeV Fq+ (q=2–9) in collisions with Ne and Ar

Clicks: 59
ID: 268724
1995
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Popular

Ranked #23 of 24 articles by views in physical review a

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Charge-exchange processes in fast collisions of ${\mathrm{F}}^{\mathit{q}+}$ (q=2--9) on Ne and Ar gas targets have been studied using the projectile--recoil-ion coincidence method. The target ionization without a projectile charge change increases with increasing projectile charge approximately as \ensuremath{\sim}${\mathit{q}}^{1.4}$. This dependence is weaker than the ${\mathit{q}}^{2}$ dependence predicted by the first Born approximation because of the large ionization probabilities involved. The single-electron-capture cross sections follow the known ${\mathit{q}}^{3}$ scaling law, while the double-electron-capture cross sections display a ${\mathit{q}}^{6}$ dependence, as predicted by the independent-electron approximation for small capture probabilities. Single- and double-electron loss from the L shell decreases with increasing q mainly because of the decrease in the number of L-shell electrons, while binding-energy effects play only a minor role. In contrast, the large sudden decrease in electron-loss cross sections once K-shell electrons must be removed is due to the large increase in binding energy.
Reference Key
heber1995physicalmultiple-electron Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors O. Heber;G. Sampoll;B. B. Bandong;R. J. Maurer;R. L. Watson;I. Ben-Itzhak;J. M. Sanders;J. L. Shinpaugh;P. Richard;
Journal physical review a
Year 1995
DOI
doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.52.4578
URL
Keywords

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.