Validation and Recalibration of Two Multivariable Prognostic Models for Survival and Independence in Acute Stroke
Clicks: 296
ID: 268654
2016
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Improving Quality
0.0
/100
Combines engagement data with AI-assessed academic quality
Reader Engagement
Emerging Content
30.0
/100
295 views
18 readers
Trending
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Abstract
Both prognostic models performed well overall in a clinical trial population. The choice between them is probably better based on clinical and practical considerations than on statistical considerations.
Abstract Quality Issue:
This abstract appears to be incomplete or contains metadata (28 words).
Try re-searching for a better abstract.
| Reference Key |
j2016plosvalidation
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Sim J;Teece L;Dennis MS;Roffe C; ;; |
| Journal | PloS one |
| Year | 2016 |
| DOI |
DOI not found
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
National Center for Biotechnology Information
NCBI
NLM
MEDLINE
humans
pubmed abstract
nih
national institutes of health
national library of medicine
prognosis
treatment outcome
research support
non-u.s. gov't
female
male
linear models
severity of illness index
Cohort Studies
Proportional Hazards Models
multivariate analysis
predictive value of tests
validation study
roc curve
calibration
risk assessment / methods
investigators=[]
affs=[])
pmid:27227988
pmc4881958
doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0153527
julius sim
lucy teece
collabauthor(name='soࠢs study team'
oxygen / therapeutic use
stroke / diagnosis*
stroke / mortality*
|
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.