Why did carbon become the pseudo-limiting factor in aquatic closed ecological systems?

Clicks: 250
ID: 26863
2019
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Star

Ranked #3 of 6 articles by views in life sciences in space research

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Closure from the earth's atmosphere is a critical test of an ecosystem's ability to function. In our earlier testing of autotrophic Closed Ecological Systems (CESs), a C:N ratio of 26.4 (3.3 mM NaHCO and 0.125 mM NaNO3) supported algal and Daphnia populations for months, but developed extreme pH values (∼11 ungrazed, >10, grazed), suggesting that the systems were carbon-limited. Only approximately half the HCO (bicarbonate) would be expected to be available to green algae, the other portion becoming CO (carbonate). In an experiment described here, CESs were developed to explore a greater range of C:N ratios. To keep the medium from becoming too osmotically concentrated, NaNO was reduced to 0.0312 mM and NaHCO tested at 3.3, 13.2, and 26.4 mM, resulting in nominal C:N ratios of 105, 422, and 845. However, additional carbon was not beneficial to long-term survival of the organisms. The algal abundance was relatively insensitive to C:N ratio; greater concentrations of C were not beneficial. Daphnia populations were sensitive to C:N ratio and persisted longer at the lowest C:N ratio of 105. All of the C:N ratios tested in these CESs are outside of the expected range suggested from ecological studies, which is based on the Redfield Ratio of 6.625 C:N, the expected chemical composition of algae. Two potential explanations for the apparent high C demand in our CESs are suggested by the literature. The first is production of fatty algal cells, e.g., one of the algal species, Scenedesmus obliquus, is reported to produce high-lipid cells that could have a higher C:N ratio than the Redfield Ratio. The second is "carbon overconsumption," which has been suggested for N-limited marine phytoplankton communities dominated by diatoms or nutrient deficient algal communities dominated by small cells that are under-represented by chlorophyll a measurements. The unexpected C dynamics found in our CES tests could be relevant to the design of biological life support systems that must be provisioned with adequate elements for long-term ecosystem functionality. If the actual demand for C is underestimated, its storage may be inadequate.
Reference Key
taub2019whylife Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Taub, Frieda B;
Journal life sciences in space research
Year 2019
DOI
S2214-5524(18)30050-6
URL
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.