Plant Leaf Position Estimation with Computer Vision

Clicks: 310
ID: 268315
2020
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Emerging

Ranked #463 of 1,694 articles by views in sensors

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 1,694 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Autonomous analysis of plants, such as for phenotyping and health monitoring etc., often requires the reliable identification and localization of single leaves, a task complicated by their complex and variable shape. Robotic sensor platforms commonly use depth sensors that rely on either infrared light or ultrasound, in addition to imaging. However, infrared methods have the disadvantage of being affected by the presence of ambient light, and ultrasound methods generally have too wide a field of view, making them ineffective for measuring complex and intricate structures. Alternatives may include stereoscopic or structured light scanners, but these can be costly and overly complex to implement. This article presents a fully computer-vision based solution capable of estimating the three-dimensional location of all leaves of a subject plant with the use of a single digital camera autonomously positioned by a three-axis linear robot. A custom trained neural network was used to classify leaves captured in multiple images taken of a subject plant. Parallax calculations were applied to predict leaf depth, and from this, the three-dimensional position. This article demonstrates proof of concept of the method, and initial tests with positioned leaves suggest an expected error of 20 mm. Future modifications are identified to further improve accuracy and utility across different plant canopies.
Reference Key
beadle2020sensorsplant Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors James Beadle;C. James Taylor;Kirsti Ashworth;David Cheneler;Beadle, James;Taylor, C. James;Ashworth, Kirsti;Cheneler, David;
Journal sensors
Year 2020
DOI
10.3390/s20205933
URL
Keywords

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.